Please think before naming your children. Giving your children stupid names
should be classed as a minor form of child abuse.
1) If you give your child a 'classy' name like Chardonnay or Chantelle, please
check the spelling.
2) Do not give the child the same name as either parent. Junior is not a good
name for a child.
3) Do not give your child a similar sounding name to its siblings. Aqeeb and
Naqeeb are just too similar sounding.
4) Think about the initials. Don't saddle a kid with a name like B.J Giver, or
Philip Enus.
5) Think about the shortened forms (particularly Richard) Richard Head will
get called Dick. Victoria Vapours wil get called Vicks.
6) JUST THINK!
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
Friday, December 2, 2005
88.8% of statistics are made up on the spot
Or, why I hate my job some more
Governments are obsessed with statistics, quotas and league tables. Which is fine if you want to see who needs more funding to bring them up to speed; or if you want to close a centre, to find out who is underperforming.
Except not everything is measurable on a graph. Take customer service. OK so you can count official complaints. Or maybe average length of waiting time on the phone. But does this really provide an accurate ratio of disgruntled to gruntled customers? How do we measure customer happiness? If our customer is happy and everything is running smoothly, they do not call us. Should we presume no calls = good customer service?
I have to count the number of calls I experience everyday. I separate them into outgoing (successful), attempted and incoming. When they look at my performance in phone stats ten calls where the customer hung up within 10 seconds, count for more than a 1 hour conversations where we got enough information to complete the case. And why do I have a quoto for incoming calls? Surely this is dependant on people calling me - which if I have done my job right, they shouldn't.
Should I keep hanging up on a customer, and calling back? I'd have better performance stats. What comes first customer (officialy yes), or performance (unofficially yes).
If all centres are performing at peak, there will still be a bottom of the table. As us poor plebs see no bonus for hitting the top, why should we care. As long as we are doing our job to the best of our abilities, and we provide good customer service, stuff the stats.
Maybe that way our managers would do some work rather than compiling and interpreting tables.
Governments are obsessed with statistics, quotas and league tables. Which is fine if you want to see who needs more funding to bring them up to speed; or if you want to close a centre, to find out who is underperforming.
Except not everything is measurable on a graph. Take customer service. OK so you can count official complaints. Or maybe average length of waiting time on the phone. But does this really provide an accurate ratio of disgruntled to gruntled customers? How do we measure customer happiness? If our customer is happy and everything is running smoothly, they do not call us. Should we presume no calls = good customer service?
I have to count the number of calls I experience everyday. I separate them into outgoing (successful), attempted and incoming. When they look at my performance in phone stats ten calls where the customer hung up within 10 seconds, count for more than a 1 hour conversations where we got enough information to complete the case. And why do I have a quoto for incoming calls? Surely this is dependant on people calling me - which if I have done my job right, they shouldn't.
Should I keep hanging up on a customer, and calling back? I'd have better performance stats. What comes first customer (officialy yes), or performance (unofficially yes).
If all centres are performing at peak, there will still be a bottom of the table. As us poor plebs see no bonus for hitting the top, why should we care. As long as we are doing our job to the best of our abilities, and we provide good customer service, stuff the stats.
Maybe that way our managers would do some work rather than compiling and interpreting tables.
Monday, November 28, 2005
... Anonymous
My name is Pandora, and I'm not a vampire.
I may wear black a lot, and watch Angel, and own some PVC, and a top hat, but I am not a vampire.
I don't worship Satan.
I think Marylin Manson is a brilliant showman, but don't really like his music, and don't feel the need to emulate him.
So call me a goth, or 'alternative', or Morticia; but dont call me a vampire wannabe, a satanist, or a Mansonite.
I may wear black a lot, and watch Angel, and own some PVC, and a top hat, but I am not a vampire.
I don't worship Satan.
I think Marylin Manson is a brilliant showman, but don't really like his music, and don't feel the need to emulate him.
So call me a goth, or 'alternative', or Morticia; but dont call me a vampire wannabe, a satanist, or a Mansonite.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |